First things first. 300: Rise of an Empire has a very
interesting sex scene. In fact it’s one of the most entertaining sex
scenes I’ve ever seen in a Hollywood film. A guy who grew up in the 90’s will remember the scenes from Nine 1/2 Weeks and Basic Instinct, and a
contemporary bloke will tell his friends about the scene in this movie. It
features Eva Green, a battle board and a whole lot of hilarious wrestling.
Don’t judge me for starting this
review with a description of the sex scene, because the movie is aimed at
people like me who want to watch some blood, gore and sexytime on the big
screen. Zack Snyder’s 300 was not
exactly a narrative masterpiece – it was a ridiculously good looking film with
generous amounts of eye popping visuals and T&A. It had imagery never seen
before in cinemas – it was fresh and bold and pretty darn entertaining. 300: Rise of an Empire is as visually
arresting and well packaged as its predecessor, but herein lies the problem –
it has stuff we’ve seen before many times, because it has arrived seven years
after the first film.
The new film is a sequel and a
prequel, jumping forward and backwards in time, sifting through the events of
the first film. That makes it a narrative and editing mess, with the
filmmakers having no idea of what or whom to focus on. At one point we’re led
to believe that this is going to be Xerxes’ (Santoro) film, and then we’re told
to follow Artemisia’s (Green) story instead. Not enough? Here’s Themistocles
(Stapleton) as the Greek army hero and Queen Gorgo (Headey) who tries to jut in
the party and become the ‘main’ character. I still am not sure who the protagonist
and the antagonist were, although just like in the previous movie I was shown
the Greeks as the good guys in the end. The first movie was based on a graphic
novel so it followed its storyline, but there is no reason why the filmmakers
would again choose to side with the Greeks in this film. Greece and Persia have a
rich and bloody history and the film neither remains historically accurate nor
makes any decent argument on why the Persians were the baddies. It’s like the
Russians always being the bad guys in American video games.
Is the action any good? Hell yes.
The pitch sea battles are stunning, as is the thumping music that accompanies
them. That way the film is never boring. Like video game levels the Persians
keep sending different ships with different bosses and the Greeks device ways
to counter them. It’s the exact same structure of the first film, and there’s
even an Ocean version of the Hot Gates. There is enough
sword smashing, cutting, slicing, punching, decapitating and necrophilia to keep you
interested. The action sequences are certainly not as iconic as the ones in 300, barring one where in a huge uncut
take Themistocles horse rides across three ships and battles Artemisia. The
problem arises in the scenes in between the action mayhem where we’re forced to
look at people who are even blander than in the previous movie. It’s when you
want to tell director Noam Murro dude just give us the action, not the lame and
boring attempts at character development.
(First published in MiD Day)
No comments:
Post a Comment