The
Amazing Spider-Man 2 is much better than the first movie.
But then we need
to get into semantics, because the first movie was absolutely awful and
unwatchable. This one is bigger, more colorful and more action packed, but those three things are never
enough to make a film amazing.
Some
things about The Amazing Spider-Man 2
made me very glad – the new costume, the improved special effects and the
humor. The shots of Spidey flying through the city look really cool, and on the
big screen a couple of these sequences are quite breathtaking. In the costume,
Spidey himself is hilarious and cocky, just the way he is supposed to be. In
Sam Raimi’ss films Tobey Maguire was a terrific Peter Parker but a very bland
Spider-Man. In this reboot Andrew Garfield is an ok Parker but a terrific
Spidey. He mocks and plays around with the villains, his phone ringtone is the
Spiderman song, and he hitches rides for free by simply grabbing on to moving
vehicles. Electro shows up earlier than expected, and his showdown with Spidey
is supercharged eye candy. When Spidey zooms through the skyscrapers to catch a
Russian ruffian (Paul Giamatti), you believe there’s finally a fun superhero
film that isn’t in the dark-brooding zone. Soon enough, your hopes are quashed
to oblivion as the ‘story’ kicks in.
Nothing
in The Amazing Spider-Man 2 matters.
There are three villains in the film and you could remove any of them and it
wouldn’t affect the film. You could replace any of the villains with different
villains and it wouldn’t affect the film. You could remove every single subplot
within the film, and it would probably have a positive effect in the film. A few
deaths and injuries are shown and none of them are surprising or heartfelt
because nothing feels as if it’s on stake.
At
this moment I have plenty of questions for director Marc Webb. In a genre where
the villains are far more interesting than the hero, why would you not pay
attention to building their characters? Did you not learn anything from Spider-Man 3? In an era that makes fun
of movies like Batman & Robin,
why would you make a movie that harks back to those laughably horrible movies? Rhino
talks in a loud fake Russian accent and hams. Electro talks in an overtly
emotional tone and hams. Green Goblin talks in an overtly villainous tone and
hams. Spidey keeps seeing the ghost of Gwen’s dad, who hams just by looking at
you. Aunt May also shows up for a subplot that doesn’t make any sense. Peter
Parker is supposed to be a genius and he learns about batteries from a YouTube
video. Spidey is thrown around power pylons so as to make them sound like the
song ‘itsy bitsy spider’. Electro is supposed to be the centerpiece of the
film, and his ‘motives’ for turning into a bad guy are so unbelievably lame
it’s shocking. You’ll have to listen to the Electro theme song to understand
how close the film comes to Batman &
Robin.
The
film is written by the magician duo of Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman who have
been responsible for Transformers and
a ton of other sci fi films that have terrible writing but somehow still make
money. It’s like the studios have figured out a holy combination of marketing
bombardment and Orci and Kurtzman’s collection of cheap thrills. Webb, being a
music video veteran and the writers set out to make a string of music videos
packed to look like a movie. The structure of the entire film is simply this:
big action scene, followed by a pop song to the backdrop of Peter Parker-Gwen
Stacy bittersweet romance. The first two times it’s nice to look at, but it happens
over and over and over again until you stop caring.
We’re told about Peter’s parents in a manner that attempts to stun you with its mystery, but the mystery is so predictable you’re stunned for the wrong reasons. In a similar manner we’re told about the future of Spidey movies and the Sinister Six, but nothing more than what we learned from the trailer. Dane DeHaan might be a cheesy Green Goblin but he’s an excellent Harry Osborn, only because he’s played the same role in three earlier movies. There’s a wonderfully creepy scene where Harry meets his dying father. It’s a rare character moment, and I wish the whole film slowed down and focused on more of these. It’s what made Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2 one of the best superhero films of all time.
We’re told about Peter’s parents in a manner that attempts to stun you with its mystery, but the mystery is so predictable you’re stunned for the wrong reasons. In a similar manner we’re told about the future of Spidey movies and the Sinister Six, but nothing more than what we learned from the trailer. Dane DeHaan might be a cheesy Green Goblin but he’s an excellent Harry Osborn, only because he’s played the same role in three earlier movies. There’s a wonderfully creepy scene where Harry meets his dying father. It’s a rare character moment, and I wish the whole film slowed down and focused on more of these. It’s what made Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2 one of the best superhero films of all time.
(First published in MiD Day)
No comments:
Post a Comment