I’ll
be honest – when it was announced that Darren Aronofsky was making a film on
Noah’s Ark, I was disappointed. This is a filmmaker who has made path breaking
cult hits such as Pi and Requiem for a Dream. Even Black Swan, which wasn’t a very original
film was still dark and had that Aronofsky edge to it. I wanted him to make
another thriller or a drama, and I didn’t least expect him to make a biblical
epic. So how does Noah fare? It’s the least impressive Darren Aronofsky film, but not
necessarily a bad one.
The
problem with Biblical epics is always the same – they’re based on stories told
over and over again, and they take themselves too seriously. As an atheist I
may be biased against a film on Noah but that doesn’t mean I won’t enjoy a good
yarn on the big screen. Noah, it
turns out, is the most ‘commercial’ Aronofsky film, while still barely
maintaining the dark nature of his direction. The bigger problem was the film
comes just a few years after the epic disaster of Steve Carrell’s Evan Almighty, which tried to spoof
Noah’s tale.
Russell
Crowe is a bald, bearded badass of a Noah, and the film has a lot of the
filmmaking and visual style of Nicholas Winding Refn’s Valhalla Rising. Like that movie, Noah has a hypnotic quality to it
whenever it digs into the psychology of its mythological characters. Like that
movie, it poses a few moral dilemmas to the audience through its protagonist. There’s
a Lord of the Rings vibe to it as
well, especially when the supernatural stuff and CGI monsters arrive. It’s
grand and it’s visually spectacular, and it does manage to pull off its vision
in the big VFX money shots. Not to mention the
amazing score by Clint Mansell who reuses some bits from his previous Aronofsky
collaboration The Fountain.
Unfortunately, that’s all there is to the movie – it’s a fun CGI fest, hollow on layers and philosophy. If you want to see a Noah theme park ride, this is the best ever made. But if you want to see a double-edged, ambitious, deeply introspective version of Noah, you’ll be disappointed. The film assumes that everything in the Old Testament is true, and asks you to assume the same. It does pander to the Christian audiences more than the average existentialist Aronofsky fan. It’s a mainstream film, for mainstream audiences, with mainstream actors. It’ll be your own fault if you expect anything remotely different or edgy from the movie. Don’t blame Aronofsky for trying something commercial – he’s crossed over fairly well, and you’ll enjoy the movie for what it is.
Unfortunately, that’s all there is to the movie – it’s a fun CGI fest, hollow on layers and philosophy. If you want to see a Noah theme park ride, this is the best ever made. But if you want to see a double-edged, ambitious, deeply introspective version of Noah, you’ll be disappointed. The film assumes that everything in the Old Testament is true, and asks you to assume the same. It does pander to the Christian audiences more than the average existentialist Aronofsky fan. It’s a mainstream film, for mainstream audiences, with mainstream actors. It’ll be your own fault if you expect anything remotely different or edgy from the movie. Don’t blame Aronofsky for trying something commercial – he’s crossed over fairly well, and you’ll enjoy the movie for what it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment