So
along comes The Imitation Game, starring Benedict Cumberbatch as Alan Turing, the
scientist who helped break secret Nazi codes in World War 2 and helped Britain
and America give Germany a good buggering. Turing was also responsible for creating
the backbone for personal digital computing and artificial intelligence, and was
also castrated by the British government for being a homosexual. Turns out, The Imitation Game has been aptly named - it perfectly emulates every historical World War 2 drama about a legendary man who changed the war and the course of history.
We’re
introduced to a very handsome Cumberbatch as the young and mildly cocky Turing
who enlists in the MI6 as a code breaker. He has no experience in warfare nor
in the art of interviewing. But he gets the job because he knows stuff that the
general public doesn’t – that the Nazis use a special code called Enigma to coordinate naval attacks. Turing knows that the British army needs
him, and that he can do great things with his already well established research
on AI. He also knows that there is no human on the planet smart enough to crack
the unbreakable Enigma code – so he comes up with the idea to design a code
breaking machine to break the Nazi code machine.
Now
a film about an incredibly smart man designing a machine that changed the
course of history is hard to dislike. There are a few things that The Imitation
Game does right, like Cumberbatch’s winning and sensitive performance,
and the production design that renders the chilly atmosphere of England in WW2. Plus
it’s a great story to tell. Unfortunately Hollywood, as expected manages to
commit the same mistake that most biopics do: being too simplistic. It’s
curious that three Hollywood films releasing this week have the same common
strand of drawbacks – they’re all biopics and are all scrubbed clean to make
their protagonists more sympathetic.
And
it’s frustrating that the film is directed by Morten Tyldum, who so
audaciously transcended the elements of formula in his native Norwegian film
Headhunters. While that movie had characters without clear segments of
antagonism or protagonism, The Imitation Game paints its characters in very
broad strokes. We’re repeatedly told Turing is a great man, and the Brits were
utterly rubbish towards him, and the Nazis are horrible as well. And yet, none
of those three things are explored in depth. We’re shown Turing’s machine that
beat the Enigma – but no detail on how he went around building it. What does
the machine exactly do? What is it made of? How long did it take to build? How
exactly does it break the Enigma code? We’re told nothing – in one scene Turing
is struggling to fight bureaucrats who don’t believe in him, in the next
they’re rejoicing over the machine being built and working.
Since
that is an unconvincing plot point, the gaps are filled with other unconvincing
plot points, like Turing’s homosexuality. It’s rendered in a ham handed way,
with flashback scenes that keep appearing in dramatic plot points just
before they culminate. So even when Cumberbatch is doing his best to move you,
the sensitivity just doesn’t come across, because by then you already know the
film is trying too hard in some places to gain sympathy from you, and not trying enough in other places to genuinely move you.
There
is a whole subplot featuring Kiera Knightley as Turing’s student who eventually is about to marry him, and the dynamics and complications of a woman marrying a gay man
are never explored. And when the gay angle is brought in, the film is too
scared to give you the full details of Turing’s life. The most important chunk
of Turing’s life when he was living in with a homeless man is excised
completely. Nor are there any concrete details on his life after the war, when
he was lonely and depressed, and forced to chemically castrate himself. Even
his death is portrayed by white text rather than by visuals, so it becomes hard
to pinpoint what exactly the film was trying to portray, when everything it
attempts waltzes by like a checklist of episodes. There’s also a bunch of
people in the secondary cast, like Matthew Goode and Mark Strong, who enter and
exit the frame without much to do.
The
Imitation Game is not a terrible film, it’s just mediocre. If only the writer Graham Moore spent some more time fleshing out
Turing’s life in a less Hollywoody, less Oscar baitey and a more nuanced
manner.
(First published in Mid Day)
No comments:
Post a Comment